Federal judge in Hawaii blocks President Trump’s new travel ban executive order | Welcome to Linda Ikeji's Blog





Thursday, 16 March 2017

Federal judge in Hawaii blocks President Trump’s new travel ban executive order

A federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday issued a freeze of President Trump’s new executive travel ban order hours before it would have temporarily barred the issuance of new visas to citizens of six Muslim-majority countries and suspended the admission of new refugees. The new executive ban was supposed to have taken off today, March 16th, 2017.

In a 43-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Derrick K. Watson picked out Trump’s previous comments and those of his close advisers during his 2016 campaign as evidence that his order was meant to discriminate against Muslims and declared there was a “strong likelihood of success” that those suing would prove the directive violated the Constitution.

Watson declared that “a reasonable, objective observer, enlightened by the specific historical context, contemporaneous public statements, and specific sequence of events leading to its issuance, would conclude that the Executive Order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion.”

He added:
“The illogic of the Government’s contentions is palpable,” Watson wrote. “The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed.”
Watson was one of three federal judges to hear arguments Wednesday about the ban, though he was the first to issue an opinion. Federal judges in Washington state and Maryland said they would issue opinions soon.

As the ruling in Hawaii was being handed down, James L. ­Robart, the federal judge in Washington state who froze Trump’s first travel ban, was hearing arguments about whether he should freeze the second. He said he did not think his first freeze was still in effect, though he did not immediately rule on whether he should issue a new one.

Watson’s decision might not be the last word. He was considering only a request for a temporary restraining order, and while that required him to assess whether challengers of the ban would ultimately succeed, his ruling is not final on that question. The Justice Department could appeal the ruling or wage a longer-term court battle before the judge in Hawaii.


Anonymous said...

Linda why don't you stop advertising these ponzi schemes. For some days now these yahoo yahoo boys have been draining money from innocent citizens . You know most Nigerians are gullible and as such they easily fall prey to the hands of these jobless yahoo boys. People respect you alot and as such they are signing it thinking its real because it was publish in your blog.
These same guys come out with different name everyday and its now a trend. Even yesterday same people launch two different sites 1.30 cashfeeders.com and 7pm dopedonors.com and today 12pm ligitdonation.com, I investigated and they are all from the same domain.
you are gradually losing it. If you don't retrace your step now you will have yourself to blame in future.
A word is enough for the wise.

Nnenne George said...

Na dem sabi.. #IStandWithTrump always 🖒

Esther Norah said...

These pple fighting against this ban of muslims, no problem. When these muslim terrorist will start,na una go start riot sharp sharp, period

okechukwu nnoduechi said...




PCO said...


Vivian Reginalds said...

-D great anonymous now as Vivian Reginalds

Recent Posts